In the $91.3 billion vacation-rental market, travelers aren’t just booking a place to sleep—they are buying temporary access to a completely different biological reality. From ancient Russian dachas to modern country retreats, the true luxury of a second home isn’t found in granite countertops or smart TVs; it lies in unmediated daylight, total spatial privacy, and liberation from modern digital extraction. Welcome to Experiential Hospitality 101, Episode 4, where Maxwell Alexander breaks down why the humble vacation home is the absolute pinnacle of the Experience Economy—and how changing your environment changes the fundamental conditions of human life.

The Suburban Cowboy Philosopher: Sunlight, Privacy, Leisure and the Economics of Simply Being Human
– Experiential Hospitality 101, Episode 4 — By Maxwell Alexander, MA (FIT), BFA (SVA) — Presented by HVSM Gift Shop – Wall Art, Print Copies and Human Rights Activist Apparel

When economists B. Joseph Pine II and James H. Gilmore introduced the idea of the Experience Economy in the late 1990s, they described an evolution in economic value from commodities to goods, from goods to services, and ultimately from services to experiences. Their argument recognized that economic value could expand when a business moved beyond delivering a service and began staging a memorable experience. Hospitality has since become one of the clearest places to watch that theory operate in real life.

The Suburban Cowboy Philosopher: Sunlight, Privacy, Leisure and the Economics of Simply Being Human – Photography by Maxwell Alexander

I would take their proposition one step further. Among all the things sold within the Experience Economy, the vacation home may be one of its most complete products because the experience surrounds the guest twenty-four hours a day. A restaurant gets a couple of hours, a concert gets an evening, and a spa treatment may get ninety minutes; the vacation home temporarily becomes the architecture of someone’s life. This is where my inner suburban philosopher gets interested, preferably from a lawn chair in a cowboy hat with as much skin in the afternoon sun as privacy allows. Strip away the language of luxury for a moment and the extraordinary value of the experience becomes almost primitive: a place to wake according to your own rhythm, cook and eat when you feel like it, walk outside barefoot, encounter nature directly, feel sunlight on your body and exist without an audience. The house creates the boundary around that freedom, while the experience itself unfolds through the profoundly ordinary human pleasures that modern urban life can make surprisingly difficult to access.

The money attached to that desire is enormous. According to Airbnb’s 2025 financial reporting, the platform recorded approximately $91.3 billion in Gross Booking Value during 2025, representing 12 percent year-over-year growth, alongside 533 million nights and seats booked. Airbnb’s annual filing further states that substantially all bookings on its platform to date have come from nights. A transaction volume approaching one hundred billion dollars through a single platform offers a remarkable indication of the economic value people assign to temporarily inhabiting another place.

I am fascinated by what exactly we are buying.

Embodied Scarcity in the Age of Artificial Abundance

Something strange is happening to luxury in the age of artificial intelligence. We are entering a period when images, language, entertainment and simulated experiences can be produced almost instantly. Digital abundance is becoming extraordinary, while many of the conditions my Suburban Cowboy Philosopher actually wants remain stubbornly physical. I can generate a thousand images of sunlight before an afternoon has passed, but my body still gets only one afternoon.

AI makes that distinction between representation and experience impossible for me to ignore. A machine can describe a forest beautifully and generate an endless stream of imaginary cabins, yet the human organism still has to enter the forest to feel temperature change across the skin, smell wet earth and experience the spatial freedom of being outdoors. Artificial intelligence can simulate conversation with remarkable sophistication, while the World Health Organization now recognizes social connection as an important component of human health and wellbeing. The American Psychological Association similarly distinguishes simulated AI relationships from genuine human relationships, warning against allowing the former to replace the latter.

Experiential hospitality therefore enters the AI age with a fascinating advantage: its most valuable product may be reality itself. Private land becomes valuable because land remains finite. An uninterrupted afternoon acquires value because time cannot be generated. Physical intimacy still requires bodies to occupy the same world. Sunlight remains sunlight regardless of how perfectly we render it on a screen. Privacy becomes more precious as digital systems become more capable of observing and interpreting human behavior.

The future of luxury may consequently look surprisingly primitive. A house with enough privacy to walk outside naked can offer something technologically irreducible. So can cooking with another person, swimming in natural water or falling asleep after spending the day outdoors. None of these experiences needs to compete with artificial intelligence. Their value may become easier to recognize because AI reveals exactly what cannot be synthesized.

My Suburban Cowboy Philosopher suddenly makes more sense to me from this perspective. Sitting half-naked in a lawn chair under the afternoon sun looks almost comically unsophisticated beside the technological complexity of 2026, yet the body in that chair possesses several resources becoming remarkably precious: time, privacy and direct contact with physical reality. Experiential hospitality can protect that condition. In an age capable of generating almost anything, luxury may increasingly mean having somewhere to go where nothing needs to be generated at all.

The Vacation Home Existed Long Before Airbnb

The vacation home is an ancient human idea wearing a digital interface. Humans with sufficient resources have moved seasonally between places for centuries. In Western societies, second residences frequently developed within structures of wealth and class: country estates, Mediterranean villas, seaside residences and later the recognizable resort geographies of places such as the French Riviera and the Hamptons. The architecture changed with time, while the fundamental proposition remained familiar. Economic privilege could provide periodic access to another environment and another way of living.

The Russian dacha adds another dimension to this history because it complicates the assumption that a second home must be an extravagant possession. The dacha I remember culturally could be extremely modest: a little seasonal building, perhaps without heat, standing on a plot whose garden could be more consequential to family life than the structure itself. People left city apartments during warmer months and lived closer to the land while growing potatoes, tomatoes, cucumbers, berries, herbs and other foods that could be eaten fresh, preserved or stored for winter.

Academic research demonstrates how deeply this practice entered urban Russian life. Sociologist Jane Zavisca reports in her research on food cultivation at the post-Soviet dacha that nearly half of urban Russian households grew food on their dacha plots. Her research describes the dacha as capable of functioning simultaneously as a site of production and consumption, economic necessity and status, making it considerably more complicated than the Western idea of a recreational second home.

I find that model remarkably modern because it asks us to reconsider where the valuable part of a vacation home actually resides. A spectacular building can certainly shape the experience, and architecture carries enormous psychological power, but the dacha demonstrates that the structure can also become secondary to what surrounds it. For an urban resident, the scarce resource may be the garden, privacy, outdoor space, fresh food, daylight and the freedom to organize a summer day around something other than the machinery of the city.

Luxury, viewed through that history, can be understood as access to an environment and the freedom to experience it.

What Are We Actually Escaping From?

Modern cities are magnificent human inventions. They concentrate culture, knowledge, art, medicine, education, food, sexuality, entertainment and millions of possibilities for human connection within astonishingly small geographic areas. They also make it entirely possible for a person to spend almost an entire day separated from the natural environment.

Someone can wake in an apartment, descend in an elevator, enter a car or train, arrive inside an office, exercise inside a gym, buy food inside a supermarket and return home after sunset. Even a beautiful sunny window changes one important component of the equation. According to the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements, the UVB wavelengths involved in cutaneous vitamin D production do not penetrate glass, meaning sunlight experienced indoors through a window does not produce vitamin D in the skin.

The observation becomes more consequential when we remember that humans did not evolve inside office buildings. Light functions as biological information as well as illumination, while the relationship between daylight and darkness participates in the regulation of our circadian system and sleep-wake timing. Outdoor life simultaneously creates opportunities for movement, sensory variation and contact with nature that indoor environments have to work deliberately to reproduce.

The vacation home therefore interests me as an experiential designer because it can change many environmental variables through a single decision: go somewhere else for a while. The guest has not purchased sunlight, trees, darkness, a garden or a mountain. The transaction purchases access to a place where those experiences become easier to have.

That distinction is central to my understanding of experiential hospitality.

Sunlight and the Human Animal

Our cultural conversation about sunlight deserves more sophistication than either worship or fear. Solar ultraviolet radiation can damage skin and is an established cause of skin cancer, while sunlight also participates in essential human biological processes. Those realities coexist because biology rarely organizes itself around the simple binaries that work so beautifully in advertising.

According to the NIH vitamin D evidence review, UVB radiation reaching uncovered skin converts cutaneous 7-dehydrocholesterol into previtamin D3, which subsequently becomes vitamin D3. Vitamin D contributes to calcium absorption and normal bone mineralization while participating in neuromuscular, immune and other physiological processes.

The variables surrounding that process are substantial. Latitude, season, time of day, cloud cover, skin pigmentation, age, clothing and sunscreen can influence UV exposure and vitamin D synthesis. The NIH consequently explains that individual responsiveness and environmental variation make it difficult to establish a universal prescription for the amount of sun exposure required for sufficient vitamin D synthesis.

For experiential hospitality, I am less interested in prescribing minutes of sunlight than in asking why comfortable access to the outdoors has become something many people have to travel to obtain. A person living in a dense urban environment may have plenty of sunlight falling on the city around them while possessing remarkably little private space in which to experience it. Parks are shared environments, rooftops overlook other buildings, balconies have neighbors, and public beaches operate within crowds, laws and social expectations.

A private country property changes the relationship between sunlight and the body because it changes the relationship between the body and other people. Privacy becomes part of environmental wellness rather than simply an amenity listed beneath the number of bedrooms.

Daylight, Vitamin D and the Complexity of Wellness

Vitamin D offers a useful lesson in why experiential wellness should remain curious without reducing complicated biology to a slogan. Research has associated low vitamin D status with numerous health conditions, yet association, biological mechanism, supplementation and clinical outcome remain different scientific questions. A nutrient involved in multiple physiological systems does not automatically become a treatment for every condition associated with deficiency.

The relationship with mental health illustrates that complexity. Research continues to investigate associations among vitamin D status, depressive symptoms, sleep, metabolic health and other aspects of wellbeing, while clinical outcomes vary according to population, baseline deficiency, study design and intervention. The emerging picture encourages serious attention to the environments in which humans live while resisting the temptation to make one biological variable responsible for every outcome.

The same discipline applies to hormones. Testosterone, sleep, body composition, physical activity, stress, metabolic health, nutrition and circadian biology interact within a complicated physiological system. Research continues to examine the relationship among vitamin D, light exposure and endocrine function, while findings across observational and intervention studies remain mixed.

I find that complexity far more compelling than the wellness industry’s favorite fantasy of a single intervention producing a guaranteed outcome. Human beings exist inside biological networks, and those biological networks exist inside environments. Hospitality controls a surprising amount of the environment surrounding the guest.

Nature Is Part of the Experience

Environmental psychology research on nature exposure and mental health gives this conversation another substantial body of evidence. A 2024 meta-analysis published in the International Journal of Mental Health Nursing examined adults experiencing symptoms of mental illness and found significant effects associated with nature exposure, including evidence related to depressive symptoms, stress, mood and quality of life. The researchers described nature-immersive experiences as having potential relevance to healthcare and mental health.

Another 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis examining nature exposure and mental health analyzed 113 studies from the COVID-19 period. Access to gardens was associated with lower odds of depression and anxiety, while greater time in green spaces was associated with lower stress. The researchers also rated the overall quality of evidence as very low because of methodological limitations and risk of bias, an important reminder that intriguing environmental relationships still require scientific humility.

Those findings resonate with something hospitality professionals can observe without pretending to practice medicine: environments influence behavior. A beautiful trail encourages a different experience of walking than a treadmill facing a television. A garden changes the sensory context of eating outdoors. A creek creates another relationship with water. A bedroom surrounded by trees offers a different sensory environment from one overlooking traffic. Movement, perception, attention, sensory stimulation and emotion become intertwined within the experience, which makes separating them into one neat wellness variable extraordinarily difficult.

Perhaps that complexity also explains why nature remains desirable after centuries of technological development capable of simulating more and more of it. People continue to travel to experience the real environment with their actual bodies.

Indigenous Wisdom, Human Wellbeing and the Instinct to Protect Home

Modern sustainability theory is beginning to arrive at an idea that many Indigenous knowledge systems have carried across generations: human wellbeing and the wellbeing of the living environment belong to the same relationship. I explored this idea earlier in The Intelligence of Beauty: Following the Hudson River Into the Soul of a New America, where the Hudson River became a way of thinking about land, body, ancestry, beauty and care as parts of a shared living system. Indigenous cultures are extraordinarily diverse, so reducing them to a single philosophy would repeat the flattening that serious scholarship should avoid. Yet contemporary Indigenous health research documents something remarkably consistent across many communities: relationships with land, culture, food, community and place can be inseparable from understandings of human health and wellbeing.

A 2024 systematic umbrella review of climate change, biodiversity loss and Indigenous Peoples’ health and wellbeing describes Indigenous concepts of health found across the reviewed literature as encompassing mental, emotional, spiritual and physical wellbeing while remaining intrinsically connected to land, land-based livelihoods, language, culture and relationships. The researchers found that environmental disruption can consequently produce effects reaching far beyond conventional measurements of physical health. Changes to ecosystems can become changes to food security, cultural practice, identity, mobility, relationships and emotional wellbeing because the health of a person and the health of a place cannot always be meaningfully separated.

Western environmental psychology has developed its own language for part of this relationship: human–nature connectedness, or the extent to which people perceive themselves as belonging to the natural world. A global meta-analysis encompassing 147 correlational studies found that people with stronger human–nature connectedness displayed more pro-nature behaviors and better health and wellbeing, while an additional meta-analysis of 59 experimental studies found that contact with nature and mindfulness practices could increase that sense of connection. Another meta-analysis involving 13,237 participants found a significant positive relationship between connection to nature and pro-environmental behavior. The implication for sustainability is profound because environmental responsibility may grow from emotional relationship as well as information.

I find that distinction essential. We have spent decades explaining climate change through atmospheric carbon concentrations, temperature anomalies, sea-level projections and increasingly sophisticated models, all of which remain indispensable to understanding the physical crisis. Human beings also encounter the planet emotionally. We become attached to a river because we swam in it, to a forest because we walked beneath it, to a garden because it fed us, and to a landscape because memories accumulated there until geography became part of identity. Sustainability therefore has a psychological dimension: people can protect ecosystems through policy and technology, while the desire to protect them can also emerge through affection, familiarity and belonging.

Research into Indigenous mental health and climate change makes the emotional consequences of environmental disruption especially visible. A systematic review found climate-related mental-health impacts connected not only with direct environmental changes but also with losses involving place attachment, culture and food security. Research in the Circumpolar North similarly identifies being on the land as a central determinant of wellbeing within the Indigenous communities represented in the literature, while climate-driven restrictions on mobility and traditional livelihoods can affect identity, food systems, relationships and mental health. These findings offer a much richer understanding of climate change than an environmental crisis happening somewhere outside the human body.

Climate change becomes personal when home begins to change.

For me, that is where sustainability meets one of the oldest human impulses: survival. Our survival has always depended on functioning relationships with water, food, climate, other living beings and habitable land. Contemporary civilization can temporarily obscure those dependencies through supermarkets, plumbing, electricity, climate control and global supply chains, yet the dependencies themselves remain. Emotional attachment to the natural world can therefore be understood alongside the practical reality that the ecosystems we value are also the systems supporting human life.

The vacation-home experience becomes surprisingly relevant here because temporary immersion in nature can restore something urban life frequently abstracts. A forest stops being an image on a screen when someone walks through it every morning. Water becomes more than infrastructure when a person swims in a creek and watches its level change after rain. Sunlight becomes physical rather than theoretical when it reaches the skin. Food becomes connected to land when dinner begins at a farm stand down the road. These encounters can transform sustainability from an intellectual obligation into an emotional relationship with place.

This relationship also expands my definition of luxury. A sustainable hospitality experience should consider the ecological footprint of buildings, energy, water, materials and waste, while human mental health and emotional wellbeing belong inside the same conversation. Sustainability worthy of the word has to include the creature doing the sustaining. A hospitality environment that helps people reconnect with landscape, experience pleasure outdoors and develop affection for the places surrounding them can create value for the guest while strengthening the emotional conditions from which stewardship can grow.

People’s Hospitality therefore carries an ecological dimension. Giving people meaningful access to nature can support wellbeing while reminding us what environmental protection is ultimately protecting: the living systems to which human beings still belong. Indigenous knowledge offers contemporary hospitality an important intellectual challenge here. Land can be understood as relationship rather than scenery, and our experience of a place can carry responsibilities alongside pleasure. Modern sustainability research increasingly provides empirical language for that relationship, while climate change makes its consequences impossible to treat as philosophy alone.

A vacation in the country can begin with the wonderfully selfish human desire to feel better. The deeper experience may leave us caring more about the place that made feeling better possible.

Vacation Itself Has Measurable Value

Vacation research adds another dimension to the argument. A 2025 meta-analysis published in the Journal of Applied Psychology examined 32 studies containing 256 effect sizes and concluded that vacations had a large positive effect on employee wellbeing, with benefits persisting longer than earlier research had suggested. Vacation length and other factors moderated the relationship, while psychological detachment from work and physical activity during vacation emerged as particularly beneficial recovery experiences.

For me, psychological detachment deserves special attention because a vacation home creates physical distance from the ordinary environment at the same moment that vacation creates temporal distance from work. The guest wakes in another bedroom, encounters another view and moves through a different sequence of decisions. Familiar environmental cues associated with commuting, deadlines, household routines and professional obligations temporarily recede.

Hospitality becomes the architecture in which that detachment occurs.

A country vacation home can deepen the separation because the change extends beyond the interior. The landscape itself announces that ordinary life has been interrupted. Morning arrives differently through the window, while stepping through the door places the guest into an environment where walking, swimming, gardening, cooking, reading, sleeping or spending an afternoon without an agenda can become the legitimate purpose of the day.

I can think of very few consumer experiences that alter a person’s lived environment so completely for the duration of their use.

Privacy Is a Wellness Amenity

Privacy may be one of the most undervalued luxuries in hospitality because it cannot be photographed as easily as a swimming pool. Hotels have spent generations perfecting service, yet service itself requires human presence. Someone works at reception, cleans the room, serves dinner, carries luggage or moves through the corridor. That presence can be wonderful when human interaction belongs to the desired experience.

A private vacation home offers another kind of luxury: temporary autonomy over space.

The distinction becomes particularly meaningful for the body. Human beings spend enormous amounts of social energy regulating how our bodies appear around other humans. We dress for workplaces, restaurants, streets and social expectations while continuously adjusting posture and behavior according to who can see us. Dense urban environments intensify this awareness because other people occupy so much of the visual landscape.

A genuinely secluded property can change that relationship by removing the audience, and I think experiential hospitality has barely begun to understand the psychological value of that possibility.

The Naked Body Belongs in the Wellness Conversation

Human nudity has become culturally entangled with sexuality, shame, morality, commerce and surveillance to such an extent that simply existing naked outdoors can sound transgressive. From a biological perspective, clothing is an extraordinary human technology. It protects us from weather, sunlight, injury and temperature while carrying enormous cultural and aesthetic meaning. The body underneath it remains the human animal.

Privacy gives that body room to exist without continual presentation.

Research on naturism provides an intriguing psychological perspective. In the peer-reviewed study “Good Nudes and Bad Nudes: How Naturism, Casual Stripping, and Sexting Predict Social Physique Anxiety and Body Appreciation”, researchers Keon West and Eliza Kukawska examined the relationship between different forms of nudity and body image. Their first study included 6,670 adults and found a positive association between generalized nude activity and body appreciation. A second study found that naturism and casual stripping predicted greater body appreciation, with lower social physique anxiety mediating the relationship. Because the research is cross-sectional, it establishes association rather than proof that nudity itself causes psychological improvement.

For hospitality, the more compelling idea concerns autonomy. A secluded outdoor shower, private pool, hot tub, sauna, garden, deck or swimming hole can allow someone to experience their body without simultaneously managing how that body appears to strangers.

The body becomes something experienced from within rather than continuously evaluated from outside.

That distinction reaches beyond sexuality, although sexuality certainly belongs within human wellbeing too. Pleasure, intimacy, touch and feeling comfortable inside one’s body are legitimate dimensions of human life. A wellness culture willing to discuss supplements, massages, skincare and beauty while becoming embarrassed by the actual human body creates a contradiction worth examining.

When Hospitality Becomes an Extraction Environment

The restorative potential of a private vacation home becomes clearer when I compare it with the commercial environments we have learned to accept as ordinary. Malls, amusement parks, resorts and retail spaces are carefully designed experiences. Research into retail atmospherics has examined how sensory environments influence consumer behavior, while field research has found that store atmosphere can influence actual spending. Experiential design clearly has psychological power. The more important question is what we choose to do with it.

I think of the darker application as emotional extraction. I use the term as my own experiential-hospitality framework rather than a clinical diagnosis. A commercial environment can stimulate desire and then immediately offer the transaction that satisfies it. Repeated often enough, leisure begins to feel like an economic interface in which human attention is continuously available for conversion into revenue.

Digital technology has made the relationship even more intimate. The Federal Trade Commission’s research into dark patterns documents design practices capable of manipulating consumer choices or encouraging people to surrender personal information. Shoshana Zuboff’s concept of surveillance capitalism expands the argument further by examining an economy in which human experience can become behavioral data with commercial value. Privacy under these conditions means more than hiding something. It can mean having a human experience without wondering how it might be measured or monetized.

Commercial leisure can create its own anxiety because the transaction rarely feels finished. Admission leads to another purchase opportunity; the experience keeps asking for attention after it has already asked for money. Families can feel this especially sharply when children encounter persuasive commercial environments without an adult understanding of how those environments work. What was supposed to be recreation can acquire an additional emotional workload built around desire, disappointment and financial decisions.

A private vacation home offers a different proposition. Once the stay has been purchased, hospitality can have the confidence to leave the guest alone. The house becomes a protected environment where experience can emerge from the people inhabiting it rather than from another sequence of commercial prompts. Privacy gives attention somewhere else to go: toward another person, toward nature, toward one’s own body or toward the wonderfully unproductive pleasure of doing nothing.

For me, this belongs at the heart of People’s Hospitality. Environmental psychology can be used to extract more value from a human being, or it can be used to create conditions in which that human being feels better. The modern sanatorium may therefore offer something unexpectedly radical within contemporary capitalism: temporary sovereignty over one’s own attention. The guest has already paid to be there. Let them live.

The Vacation Home as a Modern Sanatorium

The historical sanatorium offers a useful analogy because its architecture treated environment as part of convalescence. Fresh air, sunlight, rest, landscape, food, bathing and removal from ordinary routines became spatial considerations rather than decorative amenities.

A vacation home is a hospitality environment rather than a medical facility, and its value becomes clearer when we preserve that distinction. The comparison with the sanatorium concerns the recognition that changing the environment changes the conditions in which the body lives.

A private rural stay can make restorative behaviors easier because the surrounding environment integrates them into ordinary pleasure. Someone who would never schedule an hour of “nature therapy” might spend an afternoon walking because a beautiful trail begins nearby. Fresh produce becomes part of the experience when the farm stand sits along the day’s route. Sleep takes place within another acoustic and visual environment, while private outdoor space creates opportunities to encounter daylight, movement, water and one’s own body according to personal comfort.

Experiential wellness becomes especially powerful when nobody has to turn the vacation into another self-improvement assignment. Pleasure has its own place within human wellbeing.

From the Dacha to the $91 Billion Vacation-Rental Economy

Seen from this perspective, the distance between a Russian dacha and a contemporary luxury vacation rental becomes smaller than it first appears. One might contain a simple seasonal structure surrounded by potatoes while another has architectural lighting, a sauna and a designer kitchen. Both can offer an urban person temporary access to land and another rhythm of daily life. The economic expression changes dramatically while the underlying desire to periodically inhabit another environment remains recognizable.

Airbnb’s $91.3 billion in 2025 Gross Booking Value consequently interests me as more than a travel-industry statistic. It represents an enormous volume of transactions through which people purchased temporary access to somewhere else, while Airbnb’s annual filing confirms that substantially all bookings on the platform to date have come from nights.

The Experience Economy helps explain why a home can command economic value far beyond the utility of its individual components. Guests are not renting mattresses by the night or purchasing twenty-four-hour licenses for kitchen appliances. They are inhabiting a composed environment in which architecture, landscape, privacy, sensory experience and time become inseparable.

The product is life inside the place.

People’s Hospitality

My idea of People’s Hospitality begins with the belief that hospitality is fundamentally about how humans make other humans feel, and Episode Four adds another dimension to that proposition: how the environments we create allow people to feel inside their own bodies.

I am deeply interested in luxury, beauty and design, while my definition of luxury extends far beyond expensive objects. A private patch of grass beneath the sun can carry extraordinary value for someone living forty stories above Manhattan. A vegetable grown nearby can connect dinner to the surrounding landscape more powerfully than an imported ingredient selected primarily for prestige. The freedom to walk from a sauna into cold water without an audience can feel more luxurious than an enormous hotel spa because privacy itself has become the scarce commodity.

People’s Hospitality asks us to recognize that value and design around the human being rather than around an inventory of amenities.

For the city dweller, time in the country can create room for experiences ordinary life has made unnecessarily complicated. Meaningful outdoor time can emerge naturally from the landscape, movement can become pleasurable rather than prescribed, food can reconnect with the place where it was grown, and privacy can allow the body to exist outside the constant social process of presentation. Sleep, intimacy, solitude, touch, daylight, darkness and contact with nature can become ordinary parts of the experience rather than individual wellness products purchased one at a time.

Perhaps this helps explain why the vacation home has become such an extraordinary product within the Experience Economy. We pay for the house, yet much of its deepest value may reside in everything the house gives us access to around it.

The creek was already flowing before anyone listed the property, sunlight existed before the wellness industry discovered it, vegetables were growing in gardens long before farm-to-table became a marketing category, and the human body arrived with us. Experiential hospitality creates the conditions in which these elements can enter our lives together again, within an environment designed around privacy, pleasure, beauty and the profoundly human experience of temporarily living somewhere else.

Research, Citations and Resources for Further Reading

Pine, B. Joseph II and James H. Gilmore. Welcome to the Experience Economy. Harvard Business Review, July–August 1998. The foundational essay introducing the Experience Economy framework and the progression from commodities and goods to services and staged experiences.
Airbnb, Inc. Q4 and Full-Year 2025 Shareholder Letter. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Reports 2025 Gross Booking Value of approximately $91.3 billion and 533 million nights and seats booked.
Airbnb, Inc. 2025 Annual Report. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Provides Airbnb’s definitions and methodology for Gross Booking Value and Nights and Seats Booked and notes that substantially all bookings on the platform to date have come from nights.
Zavisca, Jane. Contesting Capitalism at the Post-Soviet Dacha: The Meaning of Food Cultivation for Urban Russians. Slavic Review. Research examining food cultivation, economic meaning, consumption, status and everyday life at the Russian dacha.
National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements. Vitamin D: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. Evidence overview covering vitamin D physiology, calcium and bone health, immune and neuromuscular functions, sunlight-mediated synthesis, UVB exposure and factors influencing vitamin D production.
Bettmann, Joanna E., et al. How Does Nature Exposure Affect Adults With Symptoms of Mental Illness? A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2024. Meta-analysis examining nature exposure and social, mental and physical health outcomes among adults experiencing symptoms of mental illness.
Patwary, Muhammad Mainuddin, et al. Nature Exposure and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Navigation Guide Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Environmental Pollution, 2024. Systematic review of 113 studies examining green-space access, gardens, nature visits, stress, depression, anxiety and mental wellbeing, with detailed assessment of evidence quality and risk of bias.
Grant, Ryan S., Beth E. Buchanan and Kristen M. Shockley. I Need a Vacation: A Meta-Analysis of Vacation and Employee Well-Being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2025. Meta-analysis of 32 studies and 256 effect sizes examining vacation, employee wellbeing, psychological detachment, physical activity and post-vacation recovery.
West, Keon and Eliza Kukawska. Good Nudes and Bad Nudes: How Naturism, Casual Stripping, and Sexting Predict Social Physique Anxiety and Body Appreciation. Sexuality & Culture, 2022. Peer-reviewed research examining generalized nude activity, naturism, body appreciation and social physique anxiety, including a first study of 6,670 adults.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Digital Advertising to Children. Pediatrics. Reviews children’s developmental vulnerability to digital advertising, including persuasive design, behavioral targeting, embedded commercial content and the increasingly blurred boundaries between advertising and entertainment.
American Psychological Association. Children and Advertising. Research and policy resources examining children’s understanding of persuasive intent, developmental susceptibility to commercial messaging and the psychological implications of advertising directed toward young audiences.
Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Harvard-affiliated scholarship examining the economic logic through which human experience and behavioral data can be transformed into inputs for prediction, influence and commercial value.
Hatala, Andrew R., et al. Climate Change, Biodiversity Loss, and Indigenous Peoples’ Health and Wellbeing: A Systematic Umbrella Review. PLOS Global Public Health, 2024. A systematic review of reviews examining the interconnected physical, mental, emotional, cultural and place-based health consequences of climate change and biodiversity loss for Indigenous Peoples, together with Indigenous-led responses.
Barragan-Jason, Gladys, et al. Human–Nature Connectedness as a Pathway to Sustainability: A Global Meta-Analysis. Meta-analysis of 147 correlational studies and 59 experimental studies examining relationships among human–nature connectedness, health, wellbeing, pro-nature behavior and sustainability.
Mackay, Caroline M. L. and Michael T. Schmitt. Do People Who Feel Connected to Nature Do More to Protect It? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Meta-analysis of 37 samples involving 13,237 participants finding a significant positive association between connection to nature and pro-environmental behavior.
Vecchio, Emily Ann, Michelle Dickson and Ying Zhang. Indigenous Mental Health and Climate Change: A Systematic Literature Review. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 2022. Reviews climate-related mental-health effects among Indigenous Peoples, including impacts involving place attachment, culture, food security and environmental change.
Middleton, Julie, et al. Climate Change and Indigenous Mental Health in the Circumpolar North: A Systematic Review to Inform Clinical Practice. Systematic review identifying being on the land as an important determinant of wellbeing and examining pathways connecting environmental change with livelihoods, identity, food security, relationships and mental health.
World Health Organization. From Loneliness to Social Connection: Charting a Path to Healthier Societies. Report of the WHO Commission on Social Connection, 2025. Examines social connection as an important dimension of physical and mental health, wellbeing and healthy societies.
American Psychological Association. Use of Generative AI Chatbots and Wellness Applications for Mental Health. APA Health Advisory. Reviews emerging evidence surrounding generative AI, simulated emotional connection and the importance of preserving genuine human relationships when using AI technologies.